Just curious - why build cc_mslsa.c _without_ Vista support?

[Jeffrey Altman]

Kevin Koch wrote:
> Ken and I were talking about detecting whether or not the Vista ntsecapi.h
> is in the build environment.
>
>  
>
> Why will krb5/src/lib/krb5/ccache/cc_mslsa.c build without Vista support?
> It would be convenient if there were a #else / #error on the #ifdef
> TRUST_ATTRIBUTE_TRUST_USES_AES_KEYS.
>
>  
>
> Thanks.
>
>  
>
> Kevin
>
Not everyone requires Vista support, sites that build from source may 
not be
comfortable with mixing headers from multiple SDKs, etc.

MIT should never build binaries without Vista support but that doesn't mean
that KFW should not build if the required header is unavailable.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3355 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/kfwdev/attachments/20080429/e50b3b7b/attachment.bin