Hi folks,<div><br></div><div>I'm sorry to add more confusion to the situation. Let me start by saying that Harvard's /future code is not ready for immediate adoption. It's still a work in progress, the structure might shift around, and we've only just started doing QA work on it. I wanted to let people know it existed to add to the general discussion on where we all want this framework to go. I also wanted to do the development out in the open and show everyone exactly what our folks have been hard at work on.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Modo still considers the MIT repo to be the canonical one, and we hope to get our changes merged back upstream when it's stable. There are a few features that exist in the stable Harvard repo (not /future) that aren't present in the MIT version -- cross-module search, dining (using a CSV export from FoodPro), and TransLoc support for shuttles. If those are of interest, you may want to fork Harvard. Otherwise, I encourage people to fork MIT as a general rule.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Thank you.</div><div><br></div><div>Dave<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Dave Olsen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dmolsen@gmail.com">dmolsen@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">I had the same question. Is there a canonical version of the framework? It's sort of bad enough that I've already gone off on a fork (and I'm well aware that's annoying) but seeing what could be four versions a user could now choose from... Just curious if there's a preference going forward among the options released last week.<br>
<br>
Sent from my iPhone<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
On Oct 26, 2010, at 11:02 AM, Derek Morr <<a href="mailto:derekmorr@psu.edu">derekmorr@psu.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Thank, David.<br>
><br>
> We're still running the WVU 0.9 fork, but are looking to upgrade. Would<br>
> you recommend deploying the 2.2.7 branch, or the Harvard branch? Is<br>
> there a list of differences between the 2.2.7 and Harvard branches? If<br>
> want to send patches, should we generate the diffs against 2.2.7,<br>
> Harvard, or the /future tree in the Harvard branch?<br>
><br>
> -derek<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Derek Morr<br>
> Senior Systems Programmer<br>
> Emerging Technologies, Information Technology Services<br>
> The Pennsylvania State University<br>
> <a href="mailto:derekmorr@psu.edu">derekmorr@psu.edu</a><br>
><br>
> This email was sent (at least in part) over IPv6.<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> I-mobile-u mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:I-mobile-u@mit.edu">I-mobile-u@mit.edu</a><br>
> <a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/i-mobile-u" target="_blank">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/i-mobile-u</a><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
I-mobile-u mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:I-mobile-u@mit.edu">I-mobile-u@mit.edu</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/i-mobile-u" target="_blank">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/i-mobile-u</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>