<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Hello, <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I suspect some runtime parameters in data.exf were not set correctly when you added snow precipitation forcing. Could you post the error along with your data.exf to help diagnose the problem?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I also wanted to point out that although the first guess of surface forcing was from the ERA Interim re-analysis fields, it has been adjusted by the optimization for ECCO Version 4 state estimates.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Best,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Ou<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">From: </span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">ecco-support <ecco-support-bounces@mit.edu> on behalf of Huangsj <shaojianhuang@smail.nju.edu.cn><br>
<b>Reply-To: </b>"ECCO support list, wider membership" <ecco-support@mit.edu><br>
<b>Date: </b>Monday, November 29, 2021 at 7:29 PM<br>
<b>To: </b>ecco-support <ecco-support@mit.edu><br>
<b>Subject: </b>[EXTERNAL] [ecco-support] Question about the atmospheric state estimation in MITgcm<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear ECCO group<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I am a graduated student in the school of atmospheric science from Nanjing University. I've recently run the MITgcm model (llc90 version) for my study and I found that the near surface atmospheric state estimation was driven by the ERA
Interim re-analysis fields. For my research need, I want to change the near surface atmospheric state estimation by adding the snow precipitation. So I download the snowfall data and try to input the data into the model. However, the model kept report errors.
Is there any special process in dealing with the input data? I would be very grateful indeed for any help you could give me.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Best wishes<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>